Hi John. I see that NOAA released the new 1981-2010 climate normals this month. So, as I understand, the new normals will use a data period from 1981 to 2010, replacing the old period of 1971-2000. I understand that we want a large enough data set to give a realistic climate "normal," thus the choice of 30 years. But, instead of waiting to update the normals every 10 years, is there a reason they don't simply update the normals ever year?
I could see that recalculating the average every year wouldn't likely yield any material difference in the figures reported to the public. Thoughts? I hope my question makes sense.
I read the announcement here:
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=dlh&storyid=70807&source=0
I could see that recalculating the average every year wouldn't likely yield any material difference in the figures reported to the public. Thoughts? I hope my question makes sense.
I read the announcement here:
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=dlh&storyid=70807&source=0