CAP/STEP Revenue Shortfall?

90s

New member
do the math on the difference in money available per year on the 2 & 3 yr registration. use 220,00 registered sleds. 4.4 mill for 3 yrs, & 6.6 mill for 2yrs. 3yrs =1.46/yr; 2 yrs = 3.2/yr. I may be missing something here ,but it appears that there is a shortfall in registration money available. also approx. 61,000 disc pass sold & approx. 40,000 $30 passes sold. that leaves approx. 120,00 sled that have not bought a pass.
 

groomerdriver

New member
do the math on the difference in money available per year on the 2 & 3 yr registration. use 220,00 registered sleds. 4.4 mill for 3 yrs, & 6.6 mill for 2yrs. 3yrs =1.46/yr; 2 yrs = 3.2/yr. I may be missing something here ,but it appears that there is a shortfall in registration money available. also approx. 61,000 disc pass sold & approx. 40,000 $30 passes sold. that leaves approx. 120,00 sled that have not bought a pass.

Read or re-read post #16 on this thread. I thought this was a darn good breakdown, but maybe I missed something?
 

snobuilder

Well-known member
The portion of the club dues that stays with the club is the difference maker along with the new members that can bring new ideas and energy to the local clubs. The additional money realized by the AWSC has an unknown destination until further notice.
The riders who pay the FULL, non discounted $30.00 and $50.00 (out of state) trail pass fees will be most beneficial to the segregated snowmobile fund.
 

90s

New member
Read or re-read post #16 on this thread. I thought this was a darn good breakdown, but maybe I missed something?

What I showed was the money generated from REGISTRATIONS. I did not include the totals of the revenue generated from the $10 & $30 passes. if the annual trail pass funds are added to the annual registration money, I think there is still a slight short fall. The more $30 trail passes sold means more money in the trail fund.
 
Top