Rail gun?the rail gun on it can fire projectile 144 miles in 7 seconds and follows curvature of earth and can go thru 26 Armour plates or a mountain …
Rail gun?
How'd they fit the (click →) Schwerer Gustav on there?
Schwerer Gustav: ≈1,500 (short) tons, length ≈155', width ≈23', height ≈38', max. elevation 40°, max. range (high explosive) ≈29 miles, caliber ≈31.5".
Oh, kinda like the baby brother of General Dynamics' Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS)? Gotcha.Very funny dare nash....hehe....i am talking aboot the cannon that yours truly made the prototype of......and i am old but not that old....lol.....the EMRG my man......type the word weapon after those letters as it might not show up.....there's films on YouTube as well
Oh, kinda like the baby brother of General Dynamics' Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS)? Gotcha.
I woulda thunk that almost any aircraft launching via EMALS would have been of significantly greater mass than the projectiles launched via EMRG, but "metal storm", at 1,000,000 rounds per minute? Holy sheet!Yes only the EMALS is the baby.....hehe
Think metal storm railgun.....1,000,000 rounds per minute.....thats not a typo either
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4657688/similar
Speaking of YootToobs, check this oneVery funny dare nash....hehe....i am talking aboot
the cannon that yours truly made the prototype of......and i am old but
not that old....lol.....the <strong>EMRG</strong> my man......type the
word weapon after those letters as it might not show up.....there's
films on YouTube as well
The
U.S. Navy’s $500 million electromagnetic railgun—capable of slinging
projectiles at hypersonic speeds—lacks funding and has no coherent plan
to deploy on warships. The Navy is instead pursuing an offshoot of the
railgun, a hypervelocity projectile it can fire from existing gun
systems.<br><br>The electromagnetic railgun (EMRG) is a weapon that uses
electricity instead of gunpowder to send projectiles downrange.
Railguns use magnetic fields created by high electrical currents to
accelerate a projectile to Mach 6, or 5,400 miles an hour. The velocity
is sufficient to give the EMRG an effective range of 110 nautical miles,
or 126 miles on land.
Speaking of YootToob, I just saw this one today, dated Dec 1, 2020:Very funny dare nash....hehe....i am talking aboot the cannon that yours truly made the prototype of......and i am old but not that old....lol.....the EMRG my man......type the word weapon after those letters as it might not show up.....there's films on YouTube as well
With the current state of this forum I can neither embed the YootToob video here, nor post a link to it without generating a helluva mess, but you can search YootToob for it.<br>This is Why the U.S. Navy’s Railgun Is Nearly Dead in the Water. The U.S. Navy’s $500 million electromagnetic railgun—capable of slinging projectiles at hypersonic speeds—lacks funding and has no coherent plan to deploy on warships. The Navy is instead pursuing an offshoot of the railgun, a hypervelocity projectile it can fire from existing gun systems. The electromagnetic railgun (EMRG) is a weapon that uses electricity instead of gunpowder to send projectiles downrange. Railguns use magnetic fields created by high electrical currents to accelerate a projectile to Mach 6, or 5,400 miles an hour. The velocity is sufficient to give the EMRG an effective range of 110 nautical miles, or 126 miles on land.
<br><br>Actually it's all loaded at once...stacked rounds, multiples lined up in many multiple tubes all fired electrically...no moving parts...that's how such a high rate of fire<br>...Never mind firing, that's that's gonna take a helluva wikkid <em>loading </em>mechanism.
I have a somewhat personal connection to the DDG1000.* I had what I consider to be the rare opportunity to spend five years as the lead software integration and test engineer for the software that performs the mission scheduling, execution, and fire control (among other things) for the Advance Gun System on the ship.* Needless to say, there is a certain feeling of pride to see the ship finally being accepted into service.*<br><br>While it has tremendous capabilities to impact regional conflicts, another very real contribution that this ship will make to the Navy is the experience gained from building and operating a ship this technologically advanced.* This should pay huge dividends for future combat ship programs.<br><br>By the way, the Zumwalt has a new commanding officer now but the original commanding officer was none other than Capt. James Kirk. I kid you not.<br><br>
<br><br>It’s important to understand that the railgun system was never a component of the original DDG1000 ship design, so any potential decision by the Navy to not pursue the retro-fitting of a railgun system has no impact on the ship’s ability to meet its original mission capability requirements.<br><br>The railgun may yet find a home. If it does not, it will join a long list of weapons/systems that achieved various stages of development and were never fielded. As far as the DDG1000 class ships are concerned, it’s far more likely that the Navy will pursue less expensive, but dramatically improved munitions that can utilize existing ship gun systems. <br><br>BigSix, skiroule, wirev: Well then, it must thrill ya to pieces that after spending a half billion on the Electromagnetic Rail Gun (EMRG) they've now decided to sh*tcan it, with "no coherent plan to deploy on warships"! Gubmint -- Bah Humbug!
<br>How are we shaping up against China? We will<br>
Be head to head with them next year. They have stealth <br>
Bombers with nuclear capabilities way beyond what our <br>
Force can offer. Don’t want to be an alarmist, but war<br>
Is good for the economy, right?!
<br>
<br>I agree with this.* Our greed will be our demise...*