You are correct. Seasonal roads with deep powder are very nice, but I can do that with the stock track. I just dont want to get stuck going down an old two track that has 3 feet of powder on it!
121" paddle track vs. 136" track
- Thread starter Polarice
- Start date
You are correct. Seasonal roads with deep powder are very nice, but I can do that with the stock track. I just dont want to get stuck going down an old two track that has 3 feet of powder on it!
indy_500
Well-known member
I think the cobra will be just perfect, you can still probably get a good amount of cash for your old one. guessing 200-250.
L
lenny
Guest
biggest difference will be the experience of the rider. I have a friend that will run the woods with an 03 RX1 and do well. 3-4 years back he bought a x fire and is the hero now. It's really all about the nads people. Unless you jump from a 121 trail sled to at least a 136 paddle it's not that noticeable off trail. The footprint and pliability of the rubber track is most important to me.
I had a friend that extended a 121 doo to a 136 1.5 paddle and he still sucked riding, always had to dig the boy out.
If your changing tracks regardless than why not bit the bullet and go for the longer track with a larger bit, ext kit ain't all that much cash. A 136 is good for trail also. I threw the 141 cat power claw track on my sled and that track is plain crazy, best money I ever spent. I'm not suggesting that for your application but now what a bit that thing has, it just digs and pulls
I had a friend that extended a 121 doo to a 136 1.5 paddle and he still sucked riding, always had to dig the boy out.
If your changing tracks regardless than why not bit the bullet and go for the longer track with a larger bit, ext kit ain't all that much cash. A 136 is good for trail also. I threw the 141 cat power claw track on my sled and that track is plain crazy, best money I ever spent. I'm not suggesting that for your application but now what a bit that thing has, it just digs and pulls
Man I have over $300 just in the studs! That track has only like 1000 miles on it with 96 gold digger studs. I'm just going to keep it for possible ice fishing in the future.
indy_500
Well-known member
forgot about studs, you could possibly get your money back to get the cobra paid for. SLap 350 on er and put it on CL. Just might get 320 if that satisfies you.
I see your point. I'm sure that this will be an improvement. If I decide to go all out (possibly next year) I'll buy the 2011 or later switchback assualt.
rsvectordude
New member
That track will suit you just fine. It made a world of difference on my Yamaha. I would only go with a big lug if i was riding off trail all the time. They suck big time on the trails pushing like trucks in the corners and are way slower on top end. If you ride mostly trails with some time off trail you made the right purchase!
I think everyone has made great point's on this topic. If your serious about buying a new sled next year, you should just go with the bigger lug. I went from a 121 - 136 and love it. They cost is going to be much more going the 136. Getting the longer track means getting longer carbides, Because you will push through the corner's with your stock carbides. Rail's and runner's and suspension tweeks. You will most likely not like you first ride on a longer track and have to do a some tweeking, maybe limiter strap adjustment. spring adjustment. everything will change streching it out.
Now buying a new sled with a longer track you will have minor adjustment's with the suspension, to your personal prefrence.
Good luck
Now buying a new sled with a longer track you will have minor adjustment's with the suspension, to your personal prefrence.
Good luck
Totally agree, for our style of riding, but in his case is occasional off trail. Plus the thought of buying a new sled next year, Make it an easy fix for now.
Short tracks = stucks
This was a 121x2 trench monster. Granted the video was used more as a marketing demonstration for SnoBungee, you still get the point. 136" length with 1.5-1.75" paddle is bare minimum for off-trail and also works well for seat sliding.
Has anyone ever gone from a 136 to a 121 because it was too long?? Just something to think about....
<IFRAME class=youtube-player title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GF9NwsrHFAE" frameBorder=0 width=640 height=510 allowFullScreen type="text/html"></IFRAME>
-Ner
www.teamkesslers.com
</IFRAME>
This was a 121x2 trench monster. Granted the video was used more as a marketing demonstration for SnoBungee, you still get the point. 136" length with 1.5-1.75" paddle is bare minimum for off-trail and also works well for seat sliding.
Has anyone ever gone from a 136 to a 121 because it was too long?? Just something to think about....
<IFRAME class=youtube-player title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GF9NwsrHFAE" frameBorder=0 width=640 height=510 allowFullScreen type="text/html"></IFRAME>
-Ner
www.teamkesslers.com
</IFRAME>