You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2013 Mountain sleds reviews
- Thread starter polarisrider1
- Start date
polarisrider1
New member
U must be related to PORKER.
I dont think u 2 could make a box of Kleenex last more than 15 min in a poo show room
Sled of the year again! Booya!
You drinking or trying to make us think your "so cool" because you've got the best mountain sled again??? Not that I care but the summary in the first article states that the XM slightly edges out the Pro . (Someone else's personal opinion of course.) Then what the heck is the second link there for? Those were from 2012 if you look at the time stamps on the post........
Sled of the year again! Booya!
Whoopty fricken dinger! LOL.
polarisrider1
New member
You drinking or trying to make us think your "so cool" because you've got the best mountain sled again??? Not that I care but the summary in the first article states that the XM slightly edges out the Pro . (Someone else's personal opinion of course.) Then what the heck is the second link there for? Those were from 2012 if you look at the time stamps on the post........
None of the above.
polarisrider1
New member
what's your issue ? it says mountain Sled reviews nothin about any particular sled. Have another beer.You drinking or trying to make us think your "so cool" because you've got the best mountain sled again??? Not that I care but the summary in the first article states that the XM slightly edges out the Pro . (Someone else's personal opinion of course.) Then what the heck is the second link there for? Those were from 2012 if you look at the time stamps on the post........
what's your issue ? it says mountain Sled reviews nothin about any particular sled. Have another beer.
You posted the thread as 2013 Mountain Sled Reviews, and followed up with your second post stating...."Sled of the Year again! Booya!"............So whatever that means, knowing you were referring to Poo......, when looking at the links in your first post, the second one is a personal opinion from a sled forum in 2012. The first is a review of all 4 last year from Am Sno, and the summary states the following about their findings........... (Not that I care, but wanted to know what you were booya'ing about....)
The Verdict
The big question this year was if the new Summit would be good enough to knock the Pro-RMK off its pedestal atop the mountain segment.
With the Pro-RMK already being so good and with further improvements we knew it would be a tough match. Both the Polaris and Ski-Doo are absolutely incredible machines, but in some situations the Ski-Doo is stronger.
The Ski-Doo just edges out the Polaris in our book because of its motor and how exciting it is to ride. The Polaris is still more agile than the Ski-Doo when it comes to downhill sidehilling turns as the Ski-Doo rides a little too much on its side panels and isn’t in as much control at all times as is the Polaris.
Arctic is making progress toward regaining its top mountain sled stature but the M falls a little short. Its lack of front-end flotation really hurts its capabilities in deep snow. However with all the late changes made, this sled will be even better than it was when we tested it.
All three of these sleds work extremely well and in the right hands are capable of being ridden in seemingly impossible terrain. Picking a winner, or deciding which one to buy just gets harder and harder.
But this stiff competition between the manufacturers is producing great results for those of us who regularly ride the mountains.
Enter keywords below and hit 'Find It'
E-mail Address:
Password:
Remember me Forgot your password? NOT A MEMBER?
Register | Why join?
Get our FREE monthly newsletter delivered to your inbox
Subscriber-only Content SUBSCRIBERENEWGIVE A GIFTLOGINCUSTOMER SERVICE E-MAIL NEWSLETTER CARRY US IN YOUR STORE ADVERTISE WITH US The Magazine
Why Join?
Current Issue
Back Issues
Digital Editions
Preview the Magazine
Subscribe to AmSnow
E-mail Newsletter
About AmSnow
Meet the Staff
Meet our Contributors
Contact Us
Contributor Guidelines
Advertise With Us
Advertising Links
Classifieds
Press Room
Our Survey
Find a Newsstand
Customer Service
Sweepstakes News
Cool News
Cool News Archive
Sled Tests
Hot Products
Racing
Travel
Interactive Travel Guide
Vintage
Editors' Columns
Recall Notices
Race Results Subscriber Extras
Back Issues
Sled Tests
Dyno Tests
Ask the Experts
Product Tests
West Report
Racing
Rewind Column
Shoot-out Results
Truck Reviews
Consumer ReviewsVideos/Photos
AmSnow Videos
Photo of the Day
User Submitted Videos
Photo Galleries
AmSnow Desktop Wallpaper
Web Cams Resources
Beginner's Tips
Survival Tips
Marketplace
Getaway Guide
Events Calendar
Clubs
Links
Used Sled Prices
Industry Directory
Dealer Search
Snowmobile CharitiesForums/Blogs
Blogs
Forums
Photo GalleriesMobile Site
m.amsnow.com
Copyright © 2013, Kalmbach Publishing Co.
Contact
Advertise
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Connect with us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
More great sites from Kalmbach Publishing Co.
American Snowmobiler | Art Jewelry | Astronomy | Bead&Button | Bead&Button Show | Bead Style | Cabin Life | Classic Toy Trains | Classic Trains
Discover | Finescale Modeler | Garden Railways | Kalmbach Store | Model Railroader | Model Railroader Video Plus | Scale Auto | Trains | Trains.com
Last edited:
Firecatguy
New member
magazine reviews need to be taken lightly, first sponsorship monies are the main source income for said magazines so they beat around the bush and make all the brands sound good. "they have done that for years" never really picking one or the other....with that said there is a TON brand loyalty and that is a good thing. These s;eds all do what they are intended for the biggest problem is most can not push the sled to the limits so the "my sled is better than your sled" is pure HOGWASH..........." ITS THE SAILOR NOT THE SHIP" you guys need to stop the brand blind bashing who care what each other rides who cares if snowmag says so!!!!I was labeled "brand blind" around here and that could not be farther from the truth. the biggest problem is the ones who cant seem to see past there nose when it comes to snowmobile brands instead of picking other brands apart why not start looking at how you ride? when I see someone that is 'brand blind" I let it go!! he is proud of his machine and why brow beat him about it....i mean geeze there someone on this site who swears by 1999 sled for all types of riding....
polarisrider1
New member
magazine reviews need to be taken lightly, first sponsorship monies are the main source income for said magazines so they beat around the bush and make all the brands sound good. "they have done that for years" never really picking one or the other....with that said there is a TON brand loyalty and that is a good thing. These s;eds all do what they are intended for the biggest problem is most can not push the sled to the limits so the "my sled is better than your sled" is pure HOGWASH..........." ITS THE SAILOR NOT THE SHIP" you guys need to stop the brand blind bashing who care what each other rides who cares if snowmag says so!!!!I was labeled "brand blind" around here and that could not be farther from the truth. the biggest problem is the ones who cant seem to see past there nose when it comes to snowmobile brands instead of picking other brands apart why not start looking at how you ride? when I see someone that is 'brand blind" I let it go!! he is proud of his machine and why brow beat him about it....i mean geeze there someone on this site who swears by 1999 sled for all types of riding....
Agree. It is pretty hard for many of us to improve our "Sailor skills" when we can only get west or to the North only a few times a year.
Pat, I think we beat every and all topics snowmobiling to death on this site.