I have 4 year warenty on my machine but that doesn't mean a whole lot in all honesty because when the sled goes down,,,,, it's down. Depending on problem it may be running again soon. On Mr.Freezes summit 800 r the case was junk and he was out of a sled for 6 weeks for whatever reason. You gotta look at the real world here bud. Doo is less reliable than Yamaha and Cat yet Yamaha trails in market share, go figure. I don't say that to defend Yamaha but we can all throw out stats to satisfy our bias. As far as the positives outweighing the negatives, for the loyalists that's true but for the poor sap who got screwed,,,, no way and that happens with all OEM's. We all know doo and poo has has been fighting to see who can lead the market in unreliability. As far as the mountain segment, last season 3 guys on poo's rode the doo t-motion 800 etec mountain (including myself) and we all said the same thing, bigger learning curve not as nimble as a pro. I do not make up crap about my previous sled like they are or were the best, they all were less capable so I had made poor decisions,,who cares. I will however totally agree with you on handling, the doo'a plain rock!!!!! big time!!!!
If doo ever builds a mountain sled better than Poo I will ride a doo, It just doesn't matter to many of us which one it is because we wanna go out there with as least amount of problems and the most amount of fun.
Momoney, I know your gonna come back with more words to continue to say Doo is the best at everything and that's fine but really,,,why?
It's okay to be a loyalists, we all have some bias towards an OEM to some degree but to repeatedly, blatantly throw it out there is nonsense. Sorry bud but if I see a strong bias towards a OEM and think some of it is bogus, I'll call it bogus and that's what I am doing.
4 strokes are 4 strokes and they are in a whole different ballpark. I do agree with you on doo's 4s, good stuff, very good stuff. I wouldn't mind owning one myself.