… Why aren't teachers correcting this in school?! …
Amen to that!
… Frnash correct me if I'm wrong but "I seen it" is not correct. It's "I have seen it"...so basic...
Even more basic:
"I see", "he, she, or it sees", "you (both singular & plural) see", "they see". - present tense (simple present tense)
"I saw", "he, she or it saw", "you (both singular & plural) saw", "they saw". - past tense (simple past tense)
How could it possibly be easier?
Note: Some folks, notably folks from India in particular, seem to work at making it overly cumbersome by obsessively using:
"I am seeing" … - present progressive
"I was seeing" … - past progressive
"I have seen" … - past perfect (pluperfect)
… where the simple present/simple past tenses really are appropriate, not to mention simpler and easier.
It ain’t all that hard, folks. The "K.I.S.S." principle applies.
P.S.:
How often have you heard the question: "Where are you at?"
The "at" adds absolutely nothing here! "Where are you?" is all that’s necessary.
P.P.S.:
When I see/hear: "We are going to base out of Houghton."
I’m tempted to ask: "How
far out of Houghton?"
I have to believe that they’re really going to "… base
in Houghton!", No?
Incidentally, I really suffered through English classes in elementary school — they were so dаmn boring!
I thought all this stuff was obvious, and that they beat on it so hard it bored me almost to no end.
Of course I used to read dictionaries and encyclopedias in those years, focusing mainly on etymology — where our words come from.
Then at Mich Tech I had a class called "Vocabulary and Diction".
The "textbook" we used was a rather thin little work: (click→)
“Latin and Greek in Current Use”, less than 300 pages, which was really not about Latin or Greek, but all about etymology — the Latin and Greek origins of much of English. (Many other, cheaper editions are also available, possibly used, any one's a great deal. The origins of English haven't changed much in many decades.)
Check that book on Amazon; note the first 5-star review, by P. F. Brennan, quoted here:
"I received a copy of this book in 1953 - when I graduated from grammar school.
Through the rest of my education and my entire professional life, it helped me develop a vocabulary that enhanced my ability to understand what I was being taught; and made it possible for me to communicate my knowledge with precision and color.
I have never forgotten the lessons I learned from this volume, and as a grandparent and mentor today, I was delighted to discover that after 60 years it is as exciting and useful as when I first encountered it.I couldn’t agree more as to the true value of that book."
I couldn't agree more. I believe that a solid understanding of etymology is the key to at least spelling, if not grammar too.