heckler56
Active member
700classic said it best that a diesel might be overkill for your application. i ran diesels for the last 11 years and cannot dispute the pulling power they offer. Unfortunitly the cost of diesel fuel has been higher than premium over these last 11 years.
The best tow/road vehicle I ever had was a 2003 Excusion diesel. No lying folks, that animal got 22mpg on the highway (validated filling up and not an idiot gauge). Really wish we did not sell that beast. Last road trip was pulling the sleds from Milwaukee to Munising and back on 1 tank of fuel.
I recently sold off a 2005 F350 for a new F150 with the Eco Boost. The engine seems to pull like a diesel, but the mpg is not impressing me. On the highway we have only seen 17, dispite everyone saying they get 20. (I have the 3.73 rear end which could impact that). My son bought at the same time a new F150 with the 5.0 and a 3.55 rear end. He is getting close to 20 on the highway.
I am a Ford guy and suggest you look at the new F150 with the 5.0 and 3.55 rear end (better hwy gears). If you think you need some pulling power, go with the 3.73 rear end.
My $0.02
The best tow/road vehicle I ever had was a 2003 Excusion diesel. No lying folks, that animal got 22mpg on the highway (validated filling up and not an idiot gauge). Really wish we did not sell that beast. Last road trip was pulling the sleds from Milwaukee to Munising and back on 1 tank of fuel.
I recently sold off a 2005 F350 for a new F150 with the Eco Boost. The engine seems to pull like a diesel, but the mpg is not impressing me. On the highway we have only seen 17, dispite everyone saying they get 20. (I have the 3.73 rear end which could impact that). My son bought at the same time a new F150 with the 5.0 and a 3.55 rear end. He is getting close to 20 on the highway.
I am a Ford guy and suggest you look at the new F150 with the 5.0 and 3.55 rear end (better hwy gears). If you think you need some pulling power, go with the 3.73 rear end.
My $0.02