My experience on the new signs

russholio

Well-known member
The DNR will continue to mark 90-degree turns with "sharp turn" warning signs supplemented with a new directional arrow.

In my experience the previous three days through 4 different counties and trail systems maintained by 4 different clubs, this is not true. Yes, I saw the new directional arrow sign in most 90* turns (although I would question the logic used in the location of a few of them) but I saw very few "sharp turn" warning signs.
 
D

Deleted member 10829

Guest
That's interesting russholio. I hope to find out, snow permitting, first hand next week when I'm in the UP the 12th-19th.
 

russholio

Well-known member
Might not be that way everywhere....one of the things that appears not to have changed is the inconsistency.
 

Polarice

New member
I contacted MSA about the issues I noticed in the OP.

It seems that there is a lot of here say about why the signs changed.

Some say (not the DNR) that it's to slow riders down. The DNR says it's to reduce clutter. Which is true? Has the DNR only told select individuals of a hidden agenda? That sounds utterly ridiculous.

Even more ridiculous are people trying to defend the reduced signage. Really? You really think this is a good thing? There are many reasons stated as to why this is not a good thing on this thread alone. Again, you can't argue that if it's good for the trails it must be good for us that drive cars on roads.
 
D

Deleted member 10829

Guest
There has to be more to it then to reduce clutter! That's just nuts IMO. I'm not sure the DNR has a clue as to why they did it. I've been riding in the UP since 1993, 3-6 times per year, 2,000-3,000 miles per year (except last year of course) and never once have I thought or heard someone say "you know, there's just too many signs out of the trails and I don't like all of the clutter". I doubt any of you have either, if you're honest about it.
 

russholio

Well-known member
I contacted MSA about the issues I noticed in the OP.

It seems that there is a lot of here say about why the signs changed.

Some say (not the DNR) that it's to slow riders down. The DNR says it's to reduce clutter. Which is true? Has the DNR only told select individuals of a hidden agenda? That sounds utterly ridiculous.

And there's also the "to reduce lawsuits" reason. Seems like we're not getting the whole story from anyone. So I guess it's:

A) to slow riders down
B) to reduce clutter
C) to reduce lawsuits
D) all of the above
E) A & B only
F) A & C only
G) B & C only
 
L

lenny

Guest
Here's the $64,000 question, did anyone notice themselves driving slower with the new signage?

nope, there were 5 of us on the Twin Lakes side of the loop trail 13 and we were running it hard and had no problems. All this really is is all of us being back seat drivers speculating, including myself. I rode the trail as fast as my sled could go and it's not real fast but with Simmons skis it holds a line superbly so business as usual.
 

russholio

Well-known member
Here's the $64,000 question, did anyone notice themselves driving slower with the new signage?

In the tight twisties -- yes, a little (though we always went fairly slow through them anyhow). Not because I'm worried about my driving, but rather, the Ricky Racers who think the trail is their own personal racetrack and couldn't care less whether there are signs or not.

In long straights and/or open areas where there is plenty of visibility to see what's coming up -- no, not really. But again, I'm not a speed junkie anyhow.
 

snobuilder

Well-known member
wait til it snows...this is going to be a boon for attorneys sueing whats left of MI out of it. Idiots, just plane idiots!
if the signs were unecessary why were they put up in the 1st place?

the perfect irony of this is that the same goons that abhor a drop of alchohol in a sledder is all for the irresponsibility of trail sign removal.....brings to mind a Thanksgiving episode of WKRP in Cincinnati....LOL duuuuuumb idea!
 

snobuilder

Well-known member
After going back and reading more of the comments on this tread I find a disturbing vindictive undertone throughout many of them where the feelings expressed are like " i am the good guy and I think the "crazies" or "idiots" or "ricky racer" deserves what he or she gets and if sign removal does it, I am all for it!!!"


I hope that the sledders that have ridden this year are right and the sign removal wasn't that noticable, but just a thought...think back to before this idea was proposed and then imagine someone respected on here started a tread about some vandals visciously going around removing trail signage and what the JD chit chat response would have been....LOL ...the words "lynch mob" comes to mind.
 
L

lenny

Guest
After going back and reading more of the comments on this tread I find a disturbing vindictive undertone throughout many of them where the feelings expressed are like " i am the good guy and I think the "crazies" or "idiots" or "ricky racer" deserves what he or she gets and if sign removal does it, I am all for it!!!"


It's probably easy to see it as that IF a person disagrees but it hasn't been said. Regardless of the decision of removing sign was right or wrong, our only option now that the signs are gone is how to deal with it. We would be making a huge mistake if we didn't address how to adjust and protect ourselvs.

Good guy,, bad guy,,,, deserve what he or she gets? That's kinda extreme don't you think?
 

snobuilder

Well-known member
After going back and reading more of the comments on this tread I find a disturbing vindictive undertone throughout many of them where the feelings expressed are like " i am the good guy and I think the "crazies" or "idiots" or "ricky racer" deserves what he or she gets and if sign removal does it, I am all for it!!!"


It's probably easy to see it as that IF a person disagrees but it hasn't been said. Regardless of the decision of removing sign was right or wrong, our only option now that the signs are gone is how to deal with it. We would be making a huge mistake if we didn't address how to adjust and protect ourselvs.

Good guy,, bad guy,,,, deserve what he or she gets? That's kinda extreme don't you think?

i did write" good guy" so as to not call anyone out by name but the terms "crazies"," idiots" and "ricky racer" were direct quotes from this tread, so i doubt i am any more "extreme" than many other posters.

and as far as rolling over and adjusting....I have a problem adjusting to REALLY terrible ideas.
 
Last edited:
L

lenny

Guest
i did write" good guy" so as to not call anyone out by name but the terms "crazies"," idiots" and "ricky racer" were direct quotes from this tread, so i doubt i am any more "extreme" than many other posters.

and as far as rolling over and adjusting....I have a problem adjusting to REALLY terrible ideas.

how can you say with confidence that it's a really bad idea? I have been saying I could be wrong more than once and the fact is you may just be wrong, not saying you are but you and I equally have a 50/50 chance of being wrong. Ricky racer means the guy speeding around all the time, often in your lane making you think your gonna die. Crazies and idiots are out there, Nobody is saying you are a ricky racer, idiot or crazy if you think the signs should be still up. Those guys are the ones who will suffer the most because they need the signs to dictate to them how fast they can handle the trail,, that's all we really mean,, not calling names to people who think the signs should still be up.

If you do not make an adjustment in your riding than you will be in a situation in some way or other. So far I have not made an adjustment but partially because I am always in the same area and know it very well. I am also old and slow so I don't even want to race Ricky any more because I cannot keep up. If I were to go ride trail that I have little experience I will need to use my senses much more than in familiar territory. Good or bad idea, things have changed and if we do not ride accordingly than we are at a higher risk, not saying you will hurt someone or yourself but your risk will go up if you keep up the same old same old.
 
Last edited:

sixball

New member
We got 135 miles on this past week 110 on Thursday our first chance to run the new less singes. I would say I was not overly disappointed. I my have rode a little slower but not much. I did not miss any turns no Oh $#it's. I miss them when the lighting is bad (dusk) but I am older and find driving at dusk is always less desirable. I am also use to ridding woods CCC trail and reading the trail makes all the difference ridding at any pace. I could see people getting wide on corners from coming hotter then anticipated.
Riding just myself I have no problem I may change my mind after dealing with more traffic. We need more snow to get more time on the trails. But more snow may make the trails more readable?
 
L

lenny

Guest
We got 135 miles on this past week 110 on Thursday our first chance to run the new less singes. I would say I was not overly disappointed. I my have rode a little slower but not much. I did not miss any turns no Oh $#it's. I miss them when the lighting is bad (dusk) but I am older and find driving at dusk is always less desirable. I am also use to ridding woods CCC trail and reading the trail makes all the difference ridding at any pace. I could see people getting wide on corners from coming hotter then anticipated.
Riding just myself I have no problem I may change my mind after dealing with more traffic. We need more snow to get more time on the trails. But more snow may make the trails more readable?

As the snow deepens the trail edges get taller especially on corners so yea, that will help,, good point!
 
Top