Right the people of MI can choose. Nothing is set in stone. Removing existing signs just seems counterintuitive to me. What was the original objective? To make the trails safe? Well that is a good reason, but it seems like there should be more to it. Why does the original objective matter? So we can tell if it was achieved.
Post #131 has a release from the DNR website.
From the above DNR release -
"According to Bill Manson, executive director of the Michigan Snowmobile Association, "Several of the other snowmobile states and Ontario have reduced their signs and have seen a reduction in accidents. Our objective is to provide a safe, family-oriented trail system for snowmobiling in Michigan."
From uppermichiganssource.com -
"After studying similar programs in Wisconsin and Ontario, the Michigan Snowmobile Association found a decrease in signage led to a decrease in accidents."
I don't recall the sign reduction program in WI. The speed limit in Ontario is 31.07 mph, approximately 4 mph faster than Usain Bolt's top running speed. I think if you removed signage where the speed limit is 31.07 mph it might help, but it is apples to oranges compared to MI.
From the above DNR release -
"…said Ron Olson, chief of the DNR's Parks and Recreation Division. "The sign reductions will result in less clutter along the trails and provide for more consistency statewide."
There is the clutter removal.
From Bill Manson Executive Director of the Michigan Snowmobile Association Executive Director's Desk on the Michigan Snowmobile Association website
www.msasnow.org -
"Issues are arising when a sign falls down. Lawsuits are being filed because other curves were signed."