Yes, but 40,000# is the battery pack!
The 80,000# is the GVW. Cargo weight of 45/50K would be common.
Yes, but 40,000# is the battery pack!
Yes, but 40,000# is the battery pack!
old c ell phones did have better reception. nokia 5160 was the only phone that could get reception at my cabin. this new junk is horse dung as far as reception.
It's not the phone, it's the CARRIER, dorkus.
-MezzTesla actually didn't release tare weight, but from some knowledgeable battery weight (x) kw averages it should be in the area of 11,000 lbs. According to the article I read.
Wondering where your getting your numbers from
In part, it is the carrier, but also the equipment. The equipment today has better technology, but, less than half the reception power of previous equipment. Analog Bag Phone or Brick Phone was over 3.5 watts, now your lucky to get 1 - 2 watts of digital service with the hand held. I could get longer range of service with the old brick than the new phones. Of course, you can by an amplifier/booster for another $400+ to get what you had for reception out of the box back in the day, but, now your into over a grand just for equipment.-Mezz
Telsa electric semi tractor can haul 80,000#, 500 miles on a charge. It's coming!!!
Hauling thousands of pounds of batteries isn't a problem for a semi. Battery weight is a huge issue for lightweight sleds, where every pound matters.
I believe we will all be very surprised how quickly that problem is solved, as is the last few years in battery tech is now.
really ? because I have had the same carrier for over 30 yrsIt's not the phone, it's the CARRIER, dorkus.
I believe we will all be very surprised how quickly that problem is solved, as is the last few years in battery tech is now.
It's now? Where are these lightweight batteries that can power a snowmobile for hundreds of miles, without a weight increase over a two-stroke? The tech does not exist yet.
really ? because I have had the same carrier for over 30 yrs
-MezzRc cars, boats, planes ect. have been using lightweight high capacity lithium polymer and lithium ion batteries for 15 years. Power tool industry was just a little behind the curve. Besides becoming more durable/reliable the gains in performance have been minimal. I believe current energy storage techniques are close to maxed out and a completely different way of storing it is the way to big gains.
I DID not say the batteries are here now to do what you want to with a sled as now. What I said was this, "I believe how quickly that problem will be solved". It will be here sooner than we believe it to be. Snobuilder, I really like the battery powered hand tools, and such, that I use today much more than a few years back. Smaller, much more powerful, and lighter. All of those I like!!!
I will be patenting solar panel sled wraps soon; problem solved.
Glad to have that issue resolved because if we had to each run extension cords down the trail it would just bring up that old "stay on the right side of the trail" debate.
Or, go back to the original electric powered transportation mode of trolley wires. It worked a hundred years ago, why not bring it back.
I will be patenting solar panel sled wraps soon; problem solved.
Glad to have that issue resolved because if we had to each run extension cords down the trail it would just bring up that old "stay on the right side of the trail" debate.
Or, go back to the original electric powered transportation mode of trolley wires. It worked a hundred years ago, why not bring it back.
Eventually yes but probably not as soon as you would think and even when it happens the cost will most likely be through the roof.