indy_500
Well-known member
At least it has a motor that lasts.Look at the Cat other then the front end its a xp... COPY CAT!!!
At least it has a motor that lasts.Look at the Cat other then the front end its a xp... COPY CAT!!!
Look at the Cat other then the front end its a xp... COPY CAT!!! Get it Skylar?? Go Packers.... Oh wait 1 and done!!!!
Then why sue now and not 4yrs ago when cat started using this same chasI inthe race sled.and why would doo want to build a quality motor when they can make so much money on the back end with junk short blocks.
Then why sue now and not 4yrs ago when cat started using this same chasI inthe race sled.and why would doo want to build a quality motor when they can make so much money on the back end with junk short blocks.
Obviously....have to build a case for patent infringement.
This kind of thing takes major time, engineering effort, attorneys.
Can't risk frivolous lawsuits and get case tossed out for unsubstantiated claims. This could be worse than no claim at all. Makes BRP look very bad if they don't have a strong case.
My guess is, Ski-Doo will win something out of this, the only question is, how much? Anything between monetary and cease of production is all possible.
Obviously....have to build a case for patent infringement.
This kind of thing takes major time, engineering effort, attorneys.
Can't risk frivolous lawsuits and get case tossed out for unsubstantiated claims. This could be worse than no claim at all. Makes BRP look very bad if they don't have a strong case.
My guess is, Ski-Doo will win something out of this, the only question is, how much? Anything between monetary and cease of production is all possible.