L
lenny
Guest
Help me out here people for I am trying to understand the logic of things I am hearing lately. Immediately after the horrific event in CT I had started to hear a big discussion on gun violence,,,again. What actually is gun violence compared to knife violence, baseball-bat violence, brick violence, metal pipe violence, car violence, motorcycle violence, rope violence, hammer violence, shovel violence, pillow violence, decon violence,,etc,,,,,I mean really, I consider myself a reasonably minded individual but I cannot come to terms with the logic of blaming the item of choice to kill rather than the individual with their intent.
Trust me people, I am heart broken at what has happened and I want as bad as any of you want to see PEOPLE stop doing this sort of thing. The truth is that man will always make decisions of violent actions.
I believe we dropped the ball year and years ago when we stopped punishing swiftly and harshly for peoples actions. Think of it like this, if a person invades a home and is armed, they risk their own life by the person occupying the home. They also risk the life of the occupier of the home. So if a punishment suits the possible outcome of the invasion maybe we could deter violent offenders. Maybe a punishment for such people could be long term indebtedness, a severe public beating,, and I mean severe or other strong deterrents. Right now you live in jail with free room and board and are a tax on society, what's so bad about that. What strong message do we send when we simple physically keep them away from the opportunity? Does not the temptation stem from the heart? We need strong, swift punishment and pain worked on us as kids so why not as adults.
Literally beat people close to death if they potentially could have killed someone. No one likes pain!
Trust me people, I am heart broken at what has happened and I want as bad as any of you want to see PEOPLE stop doing this sort of thing. The truth is that man will always make decisions of violent actions.
I believe we dropped the ball year and years ago when we stopped punishing swiftly and harshly for peoples actions. Think of it like this, if a person invades a home and is armed, they risk their own life by the person occupying the home. They also risk the life of the occupier of the home. So if a punishment suits the possible outcome of the invasion maybe we could deter violent offenders. Maybe a punishment for such people could be long term indebtedness, a severe public beating,, and I mean severe or other strong deterrents. Right now you live in jail with free room and board and are a tax on society, what's so bad about that. What strong message do we send when we simple physically keep them away from the opportunity? Does not the temptation stem from the heart? We need strong, swift punishment and pain worked on us as kids so why not as adults.
Literally beat people close to death if they potentially could have killed someone. No one likes pain!
Last edited: