anonomoose
New member
Very interesting responses.
I must clarify however that I don't believe in putting a gun to anyone's head, but in the short run, if companies were enticed to hire by tax credits or other similar incentives, and perhaps some tax consequences for those that seem to feel that they need to beat the system by making staff work beyond 40 hours a week, this would put a different twist on whether to gut it out and not hire, or take advantage of some nice tax reduction by hiring...this problem of hiring would end tomorrow.
Stroke of the pen....stuff.
Now faze in the tax credit and faze it out over 3 or 4 years. This would put folks to work...they would buy, creating more demand, and eventually they could cut back but the new demand would probably prevent that.
The issue of pushing stuff over seas, is a good concern, but frankly, anything that can be done over seas is going to go there anyway, so not much to prevent that as it is.
Personally I would not be apposed to anything that discourages that process either....as I am sick to death of talking with an "adviser" who has some super canned speech about "what can I do to make you happy today.." crap.
Move it back here...and I don't care who's toes we step on.
If you think about it...a worker who puts 40 hours in is more productive than one that puts in 60....it's an endurance thing. And if we pushed companies to hire enough staff to replace the over 40 work week, the whole country would get back to work. It would also give more leisure time and time for folks to buy stuff too.
While I hear some say that they can't find workers....I suggest that they advertise out of their market area and offer some assistance for workers to move there and take up residence WITH A JOB....and I think you would find more than 3 applicants would be showing up.
Also if your advertisements for workers goes like this...."Must be willing to work in a fast paced environment, be a good people person, and needs to have 2 life time worth of skills in the area of hire....." then you fit the average requirement for a job placement these days. If you don't have expertise up the wazzooo....you don't get hired. Frankly I think that this is a fishing expedition that some companies toss out there when they will hire...but only if they can find just that right kind of person....
This economy is like a big train.....once it has come to a stop it takes some doing to get it going again....far more than most figured it would. And I don't blame businesses that are holding back hiring because they know they can get the production out of fewer laborers and that means more to the bottom line. But it isn't good for the country....and ultimately everyone benefits with a robust economy, not just a few.
Right now there are a ton of have-nots out there....and those that do have a job, either take it for granted, or the company reminds them that they are "some of the lucky ones..."
I have little sympathy for those who NEED overtime to survive. That just means that they have built their lives around excessive amounts of work.
For the record....I have been self employed for more years than I want to say, but there was no such thing as overtime, and the work load went home and was there waiting when I got back to work again. (no rest for the wicked....eh?)
I must clarify however that I don't believe in putting a gun to anyone's head, but in the short run, if companies were enticed to hire by tax credits or other similar incentives, and perhaps some tax consequences for those that seem to feel that they need to beat the system by making staff work beyond 40 hours a week, this would put a different twist on whether to gut it out and not hire, or take advantage of some nice tax reduction by hiring...this problem of hiring would end tomorrow.
Stroke of the pen....stuff.
Now faze in the tax credit and faze it out over 3 or 4 years. This would put folks to work...they would buy, creating more demand, and eventually they could cut back but the new demand would probably prevent that.
The issue of pushing stuff over seas, is a good concern, but frankly, anything that can be done over seas is going to go there anyway, so not much to prevent that as it is.
Personally I would not be apposed to anything that discourages that process either....as I am sick to death of talking with an "adviser" who has some super canned speech about "what can I do to make you happy today.." crap.
Move it back here...and I don't care who's toes we step on.
If you think about it...a worker who puts 40 hours in is more productive than one that puts in 60....it's an endurance thing. And if we pushed companies to hire enough staff to replace the over 40 work week, the whole country would get back to work. It would also give more leisure time and time for folks to buy stuff too.
While I hear some say that they can't find workers....I suggest that they advertise out of their market area and offer some assistance for workers to move there and take up residence WITH A JOB....and I think you would find more than 3 applicants would be showing up.
Also if your advertisements for workers goes like this...."Must be willing to work in a fast paced environment, be a good people person, and needs to have 2 life time worth of skills in the area of hire....." then you fit the average requirement for a job placement these days. If you don't have expertise up the wazzooo....you don't get hired. Frankly I think that this is a fishing expedition that some companies toss out there when they will hire...but only if they can find just that right kind of person....
This economy is like a big train.....once it has come to a stop it takes some doing to get it going again....far more than most figured it would. And I don't blame businesses that are holding back hiring because they know they can get the production out of fewer laborers and that means more to the bottom line. But it isn't good for the country....and ultimately everyone benefits with a robust economy, not just a few.
Right now there are a ton of have-nots out there....and those that do have a job, either take it for granted, or the company reminds them that they are "some of the lucky ones..."
I have little sympathy for those who NEED overtime to survive. That just means that they have built their lives around excessive amounts of work.
For the record....I have been self employed for more years than I want to say, but there was no such thing as overtime, and the work load went home and was there waiting when I got back to work again. (no rest for the wicked....eh?)