Hells Kitchen vs. Master Chef
The participants on
Hells Kitchen¹ are already "Professional Chefs", many having their own restaurants. (These are "professional" chefs?)
Compare their skills on
Hells Kitchen with those of the contestants in the first season of
Master Chef. These were all
amateur chefs, with "day jobs" such as: College Student, Teacher, Software Engineer, Bartender, Financial Advisor, Construction Worker, Physician, Homemaker, Eldercare Worker, Marketing Executive, and the like. The closest any of them were to the restaurant business were a few who were waiters/waitresses/servers in dining establishments.
How is it, then, that by and large the contestants on
Master Chef were far more creative, were better chefs, and fared far better in the challenges than the so-called "professional" buffoons in
Hells Kitchen?
(Are the "professional chef" contestants on
Hells Kitchen deliberately chosen for their sheer incompetence
, for "dramatic effect"?)
First season winner on
Master Chef: a 22 year old college student!
P.S.
: I enjoyed watching
Joe Bastianich as a judge on
Master Chef: What a steely "poker face"
— unless a contestant's effort absolutely knocked his socks off, which might elicit a slight smirk/smile.
<hr size="2" width="75%">(¹ Yes, I know, it's a possessive form, so I should use an apostrophe here, but while the forum's stoopid automated censor allows the word without the apostrophe, it apparently objects if the apostrophe
is used, thus: "****'s Kitchen". It even munges the "naughty word" in the Wikipedia link, so you'll have to find the
Wikipedia page for
Hells Kitchen yourself if needed! Arrrgh!)