hey, I'll be the first to admit I come on strong and am relentless but here is why, not saying it is right but here is why. I have seen from an early age how lack off communication or personal understanding steer people in certain directions in their lives weather it be religion, politics, relationships,,,,,etc. Example, I am not a religious man but am a believer in JC so for personal convictions I never taught my kids about Santa or the Easter bunny. I taught them the truth first and celebrated the birth of JC on our own and than would indulge in the American tradition of the other side (Santa, the bunny thing.) I know many will feel sorry for my kids missing out on all the fun of Christmas and Easter but quite the contrary, we exchange gifts like the traditional Christmas just differently but we never loose site of the truth as we it.
I am astonished at the divide in this country. Look at politics and religion for example, we could argue all day on simple fundamental ideals we have practiced. Now we are redefining definitions and adding to the definitions. I agree times have changed but lets not step over each other but rather have serious exchange to understand each other and move forward without the hostile divide. I totally understand I am out there and some cannot link my words to this topic but here is why I say all this. Weather it be religion, politics or the Paulding light, were gonna have views from the far left to the far right but does that mean we are all right? Do we have the nads to say, "I have not considered that." Do we have too much pride to say I was wrong on that point. Including myself, I maintain the Paulding light is car lights based on observation and somewhat primitive methods but none the less efforts put forth to understand what we are seeing. Now, the opposition really doesn't offer much in the way of science. No offense Prof PC but you have posted a bunch like I have but really offered no substance. You are intelligent, that's obvious but you offer other elements that are not practical or relevant. The reason I mention this is because we are striving to understand what we are seeing. I honestly believe there is an "unspoken understanding" that's in the mix here to keep the science at bay and unfortunately it trumps the truth. How can so much observation and accumulated info just be tossed aside and not even refuted. That's what bugs me the most about opposing ideas. Our country leaders are divided to the extreme. You can listen to candidates running for office talk about the same thing and become confused. Some say that is the beauty, you make your own decision based on your liking but not all things pertain to ''our liking". Some things set precedence, some are testable and true and some seem to fall in the "grey area". What does the Paulding light fall into?
Let's practice what I have been suggesting in my rant, please. Someone opposed to the idea that the Paulding light is NOT car headlights please answer this observation but first on this condition. One person only just to keep it organized so were not drifting off. Who's it gonna be?
Here's the observation: When viewing the light as we see it, as the YOU-TUBE video sees it, as the sy-fy show saw it, how do you refute me finding the exact location of the light, parking WITHIN the span we see this light, flashing car lights back at the viewing area, parking a car at the viewing area and flashing the lights back up to the highway where we see the light and observing the light in reverse. Keep in mind while we were parked in the "sweet spot" you could see another Paulding light go by the car we parked there and they look the same. I'll be anxiously awaiting a response and I'm not be sarcastic. I seriously want to practice what I preach