I am one of those people who thought all along that covid 19 was not much worse than the flu (after seeing between 20k-80k die EACH year from the flu )and have been ridiculed because of it.
The death models predicted doom and gloom of 600k or more deaths. Of course as it turns it that number is now down to 60k by end of this covid curve. Now the covid 19 doomsday people are saying, "see , even with social distancing in place, we still have 60k deaths. It would have been the 600k with no social distancing, thus proving it was indeed 10 times more deadly than the flu".
Question: So does social distancing just SLOW down the death rates so hospitals are not overrun. It does not eliminate deaths , just slows it down. Is that correct???
Thus, if we had no s.d, we would have had the 600k death very quickly get it over with, as opposed spreading it over 3-4 months with only allowing 60k deaths to slowly occur?
So do the dooms day people think that we will have 540k deaths come fall after s.d. is lifted? Can someone clear this up for me???
The death models predicted doom and gloom of 600k or more deaths. Of course as it turns it that number is now down to 60k by end of this covid curve. Now the covid 19 doomsday people are saying, "see , even with social distancing in place, we still have 60k deaths. It would have been the 600k with no social distancing, thus proving it was indeed 10 times more deadly than the flu".
Question: So does social distancing just SLOW down the death rates so hospitals are not overrun. It does not eliminate deaths , just slows it down. Is that correct???
Thus, if we had no s.d, we would have had the 600k death very quickly get it over with, as opposed spreading it over 3-4 months with only allowing 60k deaths to slowly occur?
So do the dooms day people think that we will have 540k deaths come fall after s.d. is lifted? Can someone clear this up for me???
Last edited: