...but was surprised that there were issues.
Seriously? Surprised that there were issues? You're just in ONE club. I can only imagine how many complaints there are to the DNR.
...but was surprised that there were issues.
All I am hearing is a lot of "I'm sure" but your not sure of nothing other than you don;t like it and that;s all that matters. No one is restricting anyone from coming on this board and offering negative comments on the signage but no one has. I guess I could make ridicules statements saying that all the feedback presented so far is from liars.
Seriously? Surprised that there were issues? You're just in ONE club. I can only imagine how many complaints there are to the DNR.
Yes Polarice I was surprised there were issues, because during my riding this winter, I rode my club's trail system, two adjoining trail systems, and 4 systems in the eastern UP and did not have any problems, generally saw consistent signage, did not have any close calls and did not witness any accidents, or evidence of accidents where the signage was obviously different than in years past. From my perspective, the change in signage was a non-event.
I suspect part of the reason for that is, that it seems as if the recent trend on this board is to flame somebody as a whiner or a complainer if they say anything negative about something.
I still have my doubts (no, I'd certainly not say that I'm sure) that the change in signage will achieve 2 of the 3 stated desired results (it definitely will result in less sign clutter) but hey.....it is what it is, it isn't going to stop me from riding, and I still intend to enjoy riding. I think it will take several seasons to get a more accurate picture of the results. Time will tell.
Yes Polarice I was surprised there were issues, because during my riding this winter, I rode my club's trail system, two adjoining trail systems, and 4 systems in the eastern UP and did not have any problems, generally saw consistent signage, did not have any close calls and did not witness any accidents, or evidence of accidents where the signage was obviously different than in years past. From my perspective, the change in signage was a non-event.
Not sure how to take this but lets looks at what we can sink our teeth into. We had the issue of wondering (and still are) if the signage will be a problem. We have people who have chimed in on their actual experience of riding the trail system and so far we see no issues, Where are all the people with issues? Those who complain complain that it may be a problem but did not experience a problem. I do not know how else to say it people but so far so good. The local gov stuck the responsibility on the people and the people stepped up and handled it,,,so far. I applaude Mi for such a radical position. Who would have ever thought we could ride with our own senses without being coddled,,,damnnnnn,,,!
Everyone keep in mind, "You can't please everyone". I noticed some irregularity in signage, but we had that before the sign changes. It is not a perfect world. I suspect some would like guard rails and a toll booth (in place of permits). I like the woods looking like woods meaning less signs. From what I have seen folks have slowed down, including me.
Toll booths? There's an idea! I am picturing the set up in blazing saddles.
Not sure how to take this but lets looks at what we can sink our teeth into. We had the issue of wondering (and still are) if the signage will be a problem. We have people who have chimed in on their actual experience of riding the trail system and so far we see no issues, Where are all the people with issues? Those who complain complain that it may be a problem but did not experience a problem. I do not know how else to say it people but so far so good. The local gov stuck the responsibility on the people and the people stepped up and handled it,,,so far. I applaude Mi for such a radical position. Who would have ever thought we could ride with our own senses without being coddled,,,damnnnnn,,,!
same here!
Sounds like a plan. That way we all get charged by the miles we ride, instead of the season.I think setting up ipass stations would be better - just like in Illinois. Otherwise it would be too hard to carry all that change on the sled.
you were part of the original discussion when we had actual experiences, including mine, of danger at bridge crossings, including injuries and wrecked sleds, so to say nobody has said anything is incorrect..maybe not on this thread, but definately on a prior thread..
I guess, Lenny, I would urge you to take a look at some of the threads from a couple weeks ago where people who "whined" or "complained" about something were taken to task for it, and how there was a sentiment to get back to the "old days" where posts were of a more positive nature. There was even talk of creating a thread specifically for "whiners and complainers". So what I'm saying is, I'm not surprised if people haven't sounded off about this issue (if they do indeed have issues and if they don't, that's fine) since there's a good chance they would be put down for it. But this is getting away from the original intent of the thread so I'll leave it at that.
I, for the record, do have issues with it. They're not as great as what I thought they would be. In some cases what I thought would be an issue turned out not to be, and in some cases issues occurred that I didn't expect. While I am in complete agreement on the removal of several types of the removed signs, I still don't believe this change will have the desired affect(s) other than reducing clutter, I still think there are certain signs that should have been left up (and others that could come down), and that the whole program was implemented poorly. My experience comes from 1000 miles this season through 6 different trail systems. But no matter, it's done, it's there, I'll get used to it, over time the bugs will (hopefully) get worked out, and I intend to continue to enjoy riding.