Yes I looked at your chart....we have all known about that for 40 years...its old hash....on the other hand you did not google...palm trees under ice...or palm trees under both poles...you would of discovered that in the last 3 years they found them under both poles....our understanding has changed dramatically from that chart and those numbers are irrelevant today
Those numbers are irrelevant? The whole basis of your argument is that the climate has changed, and that magnetic pole shift is responsible. That graph shows that NOTHING HAS CHANGED. This winter is perfectly normal in the upper Midwest. They are not all cold, and never have been (since the glaciers left here).
And no, palm trees don't grow under 3 miles of saltwater. Do you mean that palm trees grew within the Arctic Circle, over 500 miles away from the north pole?