While I still don't disagree with this policy or some of the logic presented here, I am going offer up some "devil's advocacy" for the sake of discussion:
reasons for the most part the club members do 96% of the work.
if u had no club u would have no trails.
I couldn't agree more. I belong or have belonged to several clubs in other hobbies and it's the same thing. 20% of the people (or less) do 80% (or more) of the work.
Agreed, anybody that has ridden more than once should at least join 1 club in their favorite ridding area.
However, keep in mind that not all of us live in areas where there are trails or clubs that maintain them. The closest such clubs to me are at least 3 hours away. That puts a limit on how much time I would be able to contribute to trail maintenance. Even so, I don't think it would be necessary to be a club member to pitch in and help -- I'm pretty sure they wouldn't turn help away.
Also, not all of us have one "favorite riding area". I'm happy just getting riding time, no matter where it is. In fact, I try NOT to ride the same area time and again in a given year -- gets boring. But conditions, then available cash, usually dictate where I go.
I do not currently belong to a club (other than the state organization, MSA -- does that count as a club?). If or when I relocate to an area where there are trails, joining one will be one of the first things I do. Yes, I know I could still join one even though I live several hours (or more, depending on which one I would join) and haven't ruled that out, either. But again, the time I would be able to contribute to trail maintenance would be minimal. So just because I would be a club member doesn't mean that I help out any more than somebody who isn't. I know that a lot of time, effort, and money go into maintaining the trails that I enjoy -- and I appreciate it. That's why, since my ability to contribute much in the way of effort is limited, I contribute to the collection jars every time I see them.