NOBODY IS TELLING YOU THAT YOU CAN'T SMOKE!!!!!! The law is telling you that you can't smoke somewhere that it could harm others. Feel free to smoke yourself to death (litteraly) in your car or the privacy of your own home. But when you make the choice to venture into public and visit someone's place of work, or someones favorite dining establishment, leave the cigarettes in the car. Did you ever think you are infringing on OTHER PEOPLES RIGHTS? Why should the nonsmoker have to find another bar or resturaunt because he does not want to expose himself to second hand smoke? Nobody is saying the smoker can't go there, but by allowing smoking, you are making a nonsmoker make a choice. Either stay home, or risk lung cancer by second hand smoke. Either way, somones will is going to be forced on others. Either the smoker is forcing second hand smoke on the nonsmoking patrons or forcing them not to go there altogether, or the nonsmokers are forcing the smokers to take it outside. If you had to make that choice for the good of the people who elected you, which would you choose?
Mike, with all due respect, you're missing my point entirely. Personally, the ban doesn't affect me one way or the other. I'm not arguing in favor of the practice of smoking. I'm arguing in favor of the business owners being able to decide for themselves whether they choose to allow a legal practice to take place on their premises, and assume the risks of their actions. If they were free to be able to choose to allow it, then non-smokers would be free to not patronize it, and if they were free to choose not to allow it, then smokers would be free to not patronize it. It's really very simple. Freedom to choose. That's it.