Read my prior posts about expectations. And how are they one lane passageways? Most groomers are approximately 8' to 8'-6" wide while sleds can't be over 4' wide.
Snowmobile trails are not like highways or bike trails. Snowmobile trails are basically ONE lane passageways. So are most bike trails but bikes do not travel at 100 mph. How would you ever begin to 'engineer' signage for a lane where opposite travel at high rates of speed are commonplace? To me there would have to be 'Watch For Oncoming Traffic' signs every 1/4 mile to even begin to start addressing the whole signing thing if you were going to do it from an all bases covered engineering
standpoint. Again, you could put up a million signs and people with no workable common sense will still have trouble. If existing signs are in place leave them alone. The general public will 'sign' the really dirty corners on their own with homemade signage. Signs that are really needed will be there. All the other stupid and useless signs will be gone. That is how it used to be before groomed trails and DNR and clubs. With the DNR came groomed trails but also regulations and BS. Sometimes I wonder if it was worth it.
There is not an engineer in the world that would sign off liability on a two way snowmobile trail in say Wisconsin where there are no daytime speed limits no matter how much you researched it or signed it according to 'expectations'. Also your generalization about 8' to 8'6" groomers is not valid. There are no laws about how wide a groomer can or can't be. And finally there ARE sleds that are wider than 4' wide. In order to properly 'engineer' a snowmobile trail there are a lot of gray areas that would have to be cleaned up beforehand. No matter how or if this could be achieved there is still no replacement for common sense. Natural selection will kill off the idiots over time no matter how many well meaning engineers try to intervene. No slam to you or your profession but the dumb folks outnumber you 100 to 1. People have killed themselves with toothbrushes and garbage disposals. It gets even easier to kill yourself when you have 160 hp betwwen your legs. Just one last thought - Say that trails WERE 8' 6" wide and sleds WERE no greater than 4' wide what exactly is an engineer's margin for error when both are traveling at 100 mph directly at each other on a groomed trail??????? We are not talking about asphalt or concrete but a nice slippery snow/ice mix of a trail. Kinda tight even for Ricky.
I did not miss a corner. I seen two spots were others did. I never thought the stop ahead signs would be gone too. The missing stop ahead signs are on the trail that runs from Jackies Place to K&K corners. Also in the area of Club 37. The curve arrow before the arrow leading off Astor Rd. By the Peacock cemmetary towards Club 37 is a 90 degree turn with tight trees, comming the other way from Club37 the stop ahead sign is gone. This is a very straight narrow trail that ends into a "T" which is a car traveled road also. Not good.If Polarisrider and Whitedust are missing corners because signs have been removed then this is a bad situation. Any transition one way or the other should be gradual.
I did not miss a corner. I seen two spots were others did. I never thought the stop ahead signs would be gone too. The missing stop ahead signs are on the trail that runs from Jackies Place to K&K corners. Also in the area of Club 37. The curve arrow before the arrow leading off Astor Rd. By the Peacock cemmetary towards Club 37 is a 90 degree turn with tight trees, comming the other way from Club37 the stop ahead sign is gone. This is a very straight narrow trail that ends into a "T" which is a car traveled road also. Not good.
Yes I have !!!
Its not always on a marked trail, and after reading Polarisrider1's post about riding Monday. He noticed less signs from last year and more missed corners. Heck he almost missed a stop sign himself .
All my point was, is if the signs are coming down we need to get the word out.
So what MATTERS is they were there last year and now there not. That could mean more injuries !
Sounds lke an outstanding area for Tree Art.
For starts I am not an engineer and have no idea what enurmous liabiltiy is. Is this some Austin Powers joke? Whatever, I am sure a second year law student could still get your house if need be. Secondly Semis typically travel on roads and not snowmobile trails. Roads have shoulders and get to be about 25 feet wide. Except in Bangladesh, maybe. In the US a blind woman with a stick could easily pilot a semi down any typical interstate. There are no similarities to snowmobiles here at all. Unless she is also texting.First, you wouldn't believe the stuff I signed with enurmous liability.
Second, I never said there was a law about groomer widths. I stated how wide they typically are.
Third, Wisconsin State Law
Chapter 350
350.09 Headlamps, tail lamps, and brakes, etc.
(8m) No person may operate, offer for sale, or sell a snowmobile that is manufactured after May 7, 1994, if the width of the snowmobile exceeds 48 inches.
I'm not talking about engineering the trail. I'm taking about signing a trail.
The margin of error is probably a little less then two semis passing each other at 110 mph.
Will spray paint work when its really cold out? I think it does. Construction orange Tree Art, sounds good, maybe keep somebody from balling one up.
No Stop Ahead signs now? That does not seem to make any sense. Why even have Stop signs? Dave B, we really need to see that letter.
Yep times 2Yep a lot more curve signs in WI but trails are mostly twistys.